Terminal Camera v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
(Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cty. 3/6/96)
Defendant represented by Itkowitz PLLC
Marylin G. Diamond, J.
Upon the foregoing papers, it is ordered that the petition is dismissed and the stay is vacated. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate precisely what duties respondent failed to perform which would override respondent’s proprietary right to terminate petitioner’s month-to-month commercial tenancy. Petitioner’s claims that it is entitled to certain “safeguards” is without merit (Ramirez v. Luna NYLJ, July 10, 1991, at 21, col. 3 [App Term, 1st Dept]).
This constitutes the decision and judgment of the court.